Practices given poor CQC ratings or found to have higher-than-average referrals and prescribing ratings will be prioritised for a £10m support fund, NHS England has announced today.
The beneficiaries of the ‘turnaround’ fund – pledged as part of health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s ‘new deal’– will have to be identified by NHS England by 28 January 2016, NHS England director of commissioning Rosamond Roughton said.
In an update sent to CCGs today, Ms Roughton said practices found to have issues by the CQC will be prioritised for funding, but it does allow flexibility for ‘local intelligence’ from CCGs to be used as well.
This flexibility will prioritise practices with a high ratio of patients to GPs, but it will also give funding to practices with higher-than-average referral and prescribing rates.
Practices receiving funds will have to match any investment, and the specification stipulates funding must be spent in accordance with ‘CCG plans for primary care locally’.
It was also revealed that the fund will be allocated to each area on a population basis, with practices in the north of the country receiving £2.6 million, £2.8m going to the midlands and east, £1.5m to London and £2.4m across the south (see box below).
The GPC welcomed the funding, but warned it would require practices to ‘fall in line’ with CCG plans and ‘inevitably’ mean working with other GP practices at scale.
Ms Roughton’s communication today confirmed that practices given CQC ratings of ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement’ will be prioritised for funding, as revealed by Pulse.
However, she also said that CCGs could build a ‘risk matrix’ to allocate some of the funding, based on:
- Patient safety, either through performance issues or a CQC rating of ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement’.
- The ratio of patients to whole-time- equivalent GPs, where practices are not employing other health professionals to meet demand.
- A higher-than-average level of referrals or prescribing.
- Organisational issues such as ‘professional isolation’, stating that ‘a singlehanded practice has less resilience than a larger practice’.
In the letter to CCGs, Ms Roughton states the fund ‘will provide support to practices under pressure ensuring patients have continued access to high quality care’.
She added: ‘GP practices will be expected to contribute matched funding on 50:50 basis as a measure of their commitment to improvement.’
The letter added that ‘funding must not be used to support… practices that fail to engage with local CCG plans for primary care’.
The chair of the GPC’s contracts and regulation subcommittee, Dr Robert Morley, told Pulse: ‘It’s definitely a step in the right direction… but the £10m is nowhere near enough when what is required to save general practice is recurrent billions, not millions.
‘I would very much have liked to see far more the emphasis in this document on supporting practices with workforce issues, and a recognition that unless they can recruit new partners, practice closure is inevitable.’
He warned that the stipulation that practices must fall into line with CCGs’ strategies ‘is inevitably going to mean working with other practices in one form or another’.
The fund was originally pledged by Jeremy Hunt in June as part of the ‘new deal’ to prevent practices closing as a result of recruitment issues and dwindling investment.
It was hailed as a victory for Pulse’s own ‘Stop Practice Closures’ campaign and came after NHS England had been accused of allowing small and single-handed practices to fail to drive its agenda for working at scale.
However Pulse later revealed that the investment was not new money, having been siphoned from the £1bn Primary Care Transformation (formerly Infrastructure) Fund.
How the £10 million support fund will be allocated by NHS England area
North Regional team | |
---|---|
Cheshire and Merseyside |
£ 399,524 |
Cumbria and North East |
£ 463,718 |
Lancashire and Greater Manchester |
£ 826,024 |
Yorkshire and the Humber |
£ 916,375 |
Midlands & East Regional team |
|
Central Midlands |
£ 814,509 |
East |
£ 745,752 |
North Midlands |
£ 695,219 |
West Midlands |
£ 562,018 |
London Regional team |
|
North East London |
£ 612,238 |
North West London |
£ 339,077 |
South London |
£ 572,863 |
South Regional Team |
|
South Central |
£ 664,193 |
South East |
£ 1,049,299 |
South West |
£ 273,007 |
Wessex |
£ 391,182 |
Roughly £700,000 of the remaining investment will be retained to support the RCGP support scheme for practices in special measures, and to operate and evaluate this pilot.
Pulse Writing Competition 2024
Fancy yourself as the next Pulse blogger? Enter our writing competition now!
![Pulse Writing Competition 2024](https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Pulse-writing-competition-article-plug-1.jpg)
Related Articles
Pulse Writing Competition 2024
Fancy yourself as the next Pulse blogger? Enter our writing competition now!
![Pulse Writing Competition 2024](https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Pulse-writing-competition-article-plug-1.jpg)