It would have been unthinkable two years ago, but there are a number of GPs out of work today. As part of our major new series on recruitment and unemployment, Jaimie Kaffash explores the extent of the problem
‘I’ve applied for about three or four prison GP roles and between five and 10 salaried roles. I’ve also applied for around four or five ARRS roles,’ a GP locum in the Midlands says. ‘I’ve also just been emailing my CV with a cover letter to well over 50 practices about salaried roles, for any amount of sessions. I got only one response, asking for my locum rate – I sent over my terms and conditions but didn’t hear back.
‘In the last two months, I have secured two locum shifts at a surgery an hour’s drive away. I am continuing to apply for salaried roles. Never did I imagine I’d be coming out of medical school and three years of GP training, and struggle to find work.’
This GP’s experiences are not uncommon – but are shocking, especially when we consider that health headlines over the past decade have been dominated by the recruitment crisis in general practice.Â
Locums: the canary in the coalmine
In September 2023, reports began to emerge about GPs being out of work. The canary in the coalmine was a lack of work for locums. They reported having to change their rates to compete with ARRS staff. By September, this had become a flood of reports.Â
Andy Pow, board member of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants (AISMA), says: ‘That would have coincided with the Government announcing the uplift to staff pay of 6% but then not providing the full funding for it. It’s quite limited how practices can control costs, and locums are a variable cost which you can cut when money is tight.’
This situation has only intensified over the past year. In Pulse’s September 2024 survey, locums overwhelmingly reported a cut in shifts since September 2022 – more than half said work had dried up, while a mere 4% of the 172 locums who responded reported an increase in shifts over that period.Â
Since September 2022, have your locum sessions worked:
Sam Hargreaves, director of Hargreaves Medical Chambers in Liverpool, says locum bookings ‘fell off a cliff from September 2023’.
‘We used to be booked at least three months in advance outside school holidays, and always 100% booked for the month we were going in to. School holidays were booked even more in advance, with August being fully booked by the previous January.
‘We would usually have an average of 200 sessions booked per month, year-round. Now we are lucky to have 80-100, and most of those are booked at very short notice.
‘Locums are having to cope with unprecedented income insecurity, as work is now scarce and much less reliable,’ she says.
Locums’ experiences on the ground reflects this. One locum in London says: ‘Our work has significantly reduced in the last 18 months in West London and all over the UK. Many colleagues are finding it very difficult to find work. Furthermore, we have accepted a reduced hourly rate in order to get some work. This is not sustainable. I have spoken with many colleagues who are planning to leave London, the NHS or retrain in something else. Some have already left and moved to Canada or Australia.’
Some are having to look much further afield. One Bristol locum reported having to take shifts in the Shetland Islands. She says: ‘For 20 years, I had been earning most of my income as a locum GP in Bristol. In March 2024, I noticed fewer vacancies being advertised in Bristol. I saw an agency advertising for vacancies in NHS Highlands. I’d previously worked for a week in Shetland - because I wanted to at that point, not because I needed to. But when I saw the role come up this time around, I felt like I had no other option.’ Meanwhile, Pulse has reported on locums travelling several hours to shifts, including from Cumbria to Cornwall.
Have you travelled further than you would reasonably wish in order to take work?
GPs and practice managers agree there are fewer locum shifts available, with 50% saying the number they offer has fallen.
Lisa Fall, a practice manager in Dorset, says her practice found two salaried GPs in early 2024, which meant reliance on locums was reduced. ‘Since then we have been very careful about when we do and don’t employ a locum due to the financial restrictions that practices now find themselves in and the fact that some locums now want quite a high hourly rate.’
A practice manager in South Cumbria says: ‘We had seen our locum cost increase from £34,000 in 2016 to almost £80,000 in 2023. In addition, like most practices, we were replacing like for like – ie a full-day clinician for a full-day clinician. In the autumn of 2023, we recognised we needed to reconsider our use of GP locums due to the increasing costs and incoming funding not keeping up with inflation and other rising costs, so started proactively planning for the whole of 2024.’
How does your use of locum GPs compare now with September 2022?
For locums themselves, this has made life incredibly tough. But it has had wider ramifications for GPs. First, many GPs start locuming because they want to continue practising but fear burnout – as the GMC puts it in their State of Medical Education and Practice report ‘take matters into their own hands’. The lack of work has removed this potential avenue for them.Â
Competition for salaried jobs
Second, because of falling numbers of shifts, many longer-term locums started looking for permanent roles for income security. This influx of new jobseekers meant some areas had more demand for jobs than available roles. One locum in Hampshire says she has not put up her rates in six years, and now expects to have to travel further for work. She adds: ‘I don’t particularly want a salaried role but I’ve looked at what’s available out of interest and there seem to be considerably fewer roles available than in previous years.Â
Another GP in the North West says: ‘I was salaried, and then I left my role in October 2023 to get a better work-life balance. Finding locum work wasn’t easy at the start, but I was able to get some roles, including in one practice for a couple of months.Â
‘Then in September, October 2024 work started to dry up. I applied for salaried roles and was either getting no responses, or being told posts were closed because of too many applicants. I started panicking – thinking of getting work in Aldi over Christmas. I have a job now for two days a week. Ideally, I’d like to have stayed in a locum role, but I needed a bit more security.’
Their experiences are not unique. Of the 399 salaried or locum GPs responding to Pulse’s survey, around a quarter were actively looking for a new permanent role – either seeking a move or because they are currently out of work. On average, these respondents had been looking for seven months, and had identified 2.5 suitable roles over the past three months. They also reported a decrease in the number of appropriate roles since they had first started looking.
Are you currently looking for permanent work?
This has had an even greater effect on newly qualified GPs. An RCGP rapid survey from 25 July to 8 August 2024 found around 60% of new GPs had either struggled or failed to find a role.
At the time, RCGP chair Professor Kamila Hawthorne wrote in an op-ed for Pulse: ‘It’s absolutely staggering that there are not enough GP roles available when existing GPs are being pushed to breaking point. It’s especially worrying to see stark regional disparities in our findings, with GPs struggling hardest to find roles in areas that have higher levels of deprivation – potentially further entrenching health inequalities.’
While PCNs are now allowed to hire GPs under the additional roles reimbursement scheme, in mid-December, Professor Hawthorne told the Westminster Health Forum only 300 of the 1,000 roles had been filled.
Case study
I qualified as a GP in 2022 in the Midlands, and after that I worked as a long-term locum until going on maternity leave in September 2023. As I was self-employed, I funded my own maternity leave and planned to go back to work after nine months, hoping for a salaried role. However, by summer 2024 there were few vacancies and salaried posts that were advertised were inundated with applications. Often you don’t even get an email back in response, let alone an interview.
There are a lot of ARRS-funded posts. The main criteria are that you can’t have had a substantive post, which I hadn’t. But you also have to be within two years of your CCT, which I’m not because I had a baby in September 2023.
Being excluded from eligibility for ARRS-funded roles due to my time spent on maternity leave is quite a big issue in itself.
Due to the lack of salaried roles, I’ve also been applying for health tech roles and roles elsewhere in the NHS. I have now secured a role, not as a GP, but teaching medical students from January. You don’t have to be a GP to do this – you can be a junior doctor. The salary is half of that of a salaried GP but I have had to take this role.
I’ve applied for about three or four prison GP roles and between five and 10 salaried roles. I’ve also applied for around four or five ARRS roles. I’ve also just been emailing my CV with a cover letter to well over 50 practices about salaried roles, for any amount of sessions. I got only one response, asking for my locum rate – I sent over my terms and conditions but didn’t hear back.
Funding uncertainty
This ARRS extension hasn’t yet proved helpful for either practices or jobseekers. For practices, Professor Hawthorne said this low uptake was due to the uncertainty around the funding of the role, with some PCNs only able to guarantee this until March 2025. The level of funding itself is problematic, according to the BMA. It pays towards the bottom of the pay scale, and at £73,114, is only £600 more than GP registrars at the end of their training receive following the resident doctor deal agreed in September 2024.Â
The jobseeking GPs responding to our surveys are also finding problems. ‘A lot of the jobs were only for ARRS GP roles,’ says the GP in the North West. The GP in Hampshire adds: ‘Some roles are restricted to newly qualified GPs due to ARRS funding restrictions, so experienced locums are in a difficult position.’ The ARRS GP funding terms say candidates must have qualified in the previous two years, and not done a substantive role before.Â
However, the funding is going some way to alleviating practices’ recruitment problems. The GP in Salford says: ‘We have recently recruited a new salaried GP... who came highly recommended. We didn’t need to advertise as there seem to be lots of GPs looking for jobs at the moment. We are using the GP ARRS money to almost fund one session of the new salaried GP’s time. Recruitment doesn’t seem to be an issue at the moment.’
A Liverpool managing partner says: `If we were looking to recruit further, there are currently lots of GPs in the city seeking employment, so I’m confident we would be able to find one that matched our recruitment needs.’
Yet despite these practices having problems eased, the recruitment crisis has not gone away – as we will see in the second part of the series on Monday.Â
To download the full Cogora report, which includes all the data and the methodology, click here
Successive governments have applied a big squeeze on General Practice compared to secondary care
Investment has been in ARRS/non GP AHPs
whether all this was intentional or fortuitous is up to you
IMHO they are betting
that patients wont care
IT and AI will offer transformation at the front door
partners and business owners wont be able to afford to take a pay cut so GP unemployment will continue
Fittest practices will survive and APMS will pick up practices that ‘fail’
Practices who manage to pull off modern general practice find headroom and can manage
Keep telling the public the NHS is broken and gamble that GP IA and any WTR will be patchy at best
Might be wrong though
Most rational thing a young GP can do is emigrate.
We found the locum rates were simply unsustainable. The rates seemed to rocket about 2023 to about £120 per hour with some locums asking for £150. It was simply unaffordable as locums often asked for no admin which meant the partners had to do this as well.
It is a sorry situation, and hope there will be some solution.
I can’t believe the comment re alleged locum asking rates of £120-£150. Around here it’s about £85 per hour.
I do believe, however, that one of the reasons for GP principals not employing locums or salaried GPs is because it enhances their, ie GP principals’, profits to >£140k.
My locum profits are £65k – £70k.
To get a true picture of what’s really happening, would GP partners who care to comment on this topic at least tell us their approximate pre-tax profits so we have context?
It could be a cycle and soon , in Summer 2025 we will see opposite, when mass migration of GPs to Canada and Australia have accomplished and no Locum GP available while existing salaried and Partner GP will burn out completely , and other health professional will look at increased work load with no desired outcome.
In the mid 90s everyone I knew fresh out of training were competing for prized Partnerships with a secure job for life (and I was turned down multiple times).
By the early 2000s, with profits plunging, no partners could be found.
After the 2004 contract it was boom time again, as GPs scrambled to be Partners.
10 years later partnerships became unfashionable, as graduates desired portfolio careers rather than being stuck in the same dreary job for 30 odd years.
By 5 years ago many Practices were down to a few hardy partners, the others having retired/died/left, with expensive adverts for replacements unanswered, and Locums could charge a Prince’s Ransom.
Many Practices were on the brink, but then PCNs and ARRS saved the day.
And yes, the few remaining Partners , who a few years ago were working themselves into the ground for dwindling profits, are now being rewarded, whilst Locums are (temporarily) out in the cold.
But the wheel keeps turning. Many portfolio doctors are now competing for relatively scarce Partnerships, as I did 30 years ago, as they see the security despite loss of flexibility.
Ultimately Partnerships need Partners, and to now have multiple quality applicants after decades of zero candidates is gratifying.
And of course, with PAs (wrongly) demonised, once the ARRS scheme disappears in a puff of government reform, the wheel will keep turning.
Stick around and it all comes round again.
https://youtu.be/mGjmESD2jJg?si=u5mrFaUcbOsFAt0X
Situation seems bad in Canada aswell
https://youtu.be/MoO12F9eU9U?si=dYidq36aeyH2s3UG
Look before you leap
The grass may not be greener
I the comments
Canada doctors talk of migrating to the UK
What a merry go round
House price and inflation is also a problem
Might it be relevant that recently RCGP trained GPs have seen few patients, are apparently not keen on seeing patients, and apparently fail to recognise basic stuff? Whilst having a detailed knowledge of which inhalers are “bad for the planet”, and the more useless of NICE guidelines?
Might it be relevant that recent graduates of RCGP training have seen few patients, that they apparently don’t want to see patients, and consequently struggle to recognise stuff?
Whilst having a detailed knowledge of which are the most environmentally friendly asthma inhalers and being able to recite even the most useless of NICE guidelines.
Telling people with eczema that they have scabies, diagnosing genital herpes as “vaginal discharge” is not helping, nor worth much money.
I remember when I was a trainee doctor (ST1 etc) there was a real issue becoming a GP partner – there were tales of MANY MANY applicants per Partnership opening… then when I qualified I basically walked into a partnership (and have been here, very happily, ever since).
We needed to recruit another GP for the practice, and could not get applicants for love nor money! I’d speak to locums, begging them to apply for a full time job; their reply was they preferred the freedom and greater income of locumming. Fair enough.. We had to run on locums for over a year, at a great cost to the partnership. This is my kid’s inheritance that was being chipped away at!
Via a very expensive recruitment consultant we managed to fill the role, adn have been running a fulll compliment of doctors since…
Then COVID hit, and the GP press was full of concerns from locums that they weren’t entitled to government pay, and that practices weren’t employing them any more.
As per Douglass Callow’s comment above – it’s just come full circle.. The freedoms that locums REALLY appreciated when I needed them most (demand for high hourly rate, self autonomy, employment freedom to pick adn choose working days/holidays) are now the main issues leading to their unemployment.
Pleaes don’t think this is a heartless comment – I fully appreciate the issues you are facing, but…. by choosing the self employed ‘freedom’ job role, you have to accept that at some point a practice may choose NOT to employ you (in the wame way, you can choose NOT to accept a locum post at a practice). The same cannot be said for my employed staff – they remain employed and paid, by me and my partner, regardless of the practice income. That is THEIR perk of teh job – their negative is that they have to turn up to work each and every day, and may not get 100% of their holiday leave requests…
Essentially what I’m saying is that you (unfortunately) can’t have the benefit of being a ‘free agent’ and be able to pick adn choose your employment options for that week, AS WELL AS having the security (and the shackles!) of being an employed member of staff.
Ian
EDIT – not Douglas’s comment, but David Banner’s!