GPs will be required to publish a ‘patient charter’ setting out the standard of care they are contracted to provide, and will see a new incentive to boost patient continuity.
Practices will now be paid to identify those that ‘would benefit most from continuity of care’, via amendments to the Capacity and Access Improvement (CAIP) payment), according to 2025/26 GP contract details unveiled today.
And NHS England said it will publish a patient charter which will set out the standards a patient ‘can expect from their practice’, as outlined in the GP contract. The charter will then be publicly available and published on practices websites.
‘This will improve transparency for patients and make it easier for them to know how practices will handle their request and what to expect from their practice,’ the commissioner said today.
The Department of Health and Social Care confirmed to Pulse that the charter will be a ‘publicly accessible document’, which sets out ‘in black and white’ what patients can expect from their GPs and practices and will also set out what to do if patient expectations ‘aren’t met’ and what is expected of patients.
According to a letter sent by NHSE primary care director Dr Amanda Doyle to practices, the charter will include guidance on how patients can contract their practice as well as the requirements for practices to keep their online consultation tool open for the duration of core hours for non-urgent appointment requests, medication queries and admin requests.
‘This will be subject to necessary safeguards in place to avoid urgent clinical requests being erroneously submitted online. Guidance will be displayed on practice websites and reflected in the wording of the patient charter,’ she added.
Pulse has asked NHS England for more detail on what exactly will be included in the charter.
Dr Doyle’s letter also said that in 2025/26 the Capacity and Access Improvement (CAIP) payment will continue (worth £87.6 million) but will change from three domains down to two.
It added: ‘One domain will continue to focus on supporting modern general practice access (worth £58.4 million) while the other (worth £29.2 million) will incentivise PCNs to risk stratify their patients in accordance with need – including to identify those that would benefit most from continuity of care.’
A deal ‘in principle’ for the contract has been agreed by the BMA, and will see almost £800m invested into the global sum, as well as other contractual changes.
The BMA’s GP committee said that the deal is subject to an agreement, in writing by next month, from the Government for a wholesale renegotiation of the GMS contract within this parliamentary term.
Last summer, health secretary Wes Streeting said GP practices would be given incentives to offer patients continuity of care, indicating that poorer performing practices would receive less money.
And at the start of this year, Labour promised to remove ‘burdensome’ bureaucracy from GPs, but asked for better continuity of care in return.
NHS England had also hinted before Labour’s election win that continuity of care may be included in future contracts, but sought to assure GPs that this wouldn’t come with ‘silly measures and boxes to tick’.
Read all our coverage of the contract
All the coverage from the 2025/26 GP contract
At a glance: All the headlines from the 2025/26 contract agreement – Pulse Today
New contract removes ARRS GP funding ringfence and increases salaries
Large chunk of QOF retired to fund global sum and immunisation fees rise
Contract details new enhanced service to fund advice and guidance (A&G)
Dr Amanda Doyle: ‘Extensive talks were held to find a fair GP contract deal’
Editor’s blog: Streeting passes first GP test but the next few months will be pivotal
GP collective action paused as BMA ‘no longer in dispute’ with Government
Visit Pulse Reference for details on 140 symptoms, including easily searchable symptoms and categories, offering you a free platform to check symptoms and receive potential diagnoses during consultations.
Related Articles
READERS' COMMENTS [2]
Please note, only GPs are permitted to add comments to articles
Really important this covers respect & zero tolerance towards practice staff (if anyone involved in writing this is reading)
We need to reset our relationship with our patients since the open abuse allowed & supported by the media and not just bring back the family doctor, but bring back the respect for the role too.
The respect issue is related to the lack of availability for patients to be listened to. As always reception staff unfairly get the brunt of anger. My concern is our leaders continue to peddle the myth that more doctors are needed as the answer( we have more doctors but they don’t want to be traditional partner GPs!). Patients need to see a person who is caring, listens and responds to their needs. Depending on the need others are better at this than doctors. GPs ahead will need to step back from patient contact and manage the flow of the day instead. That is what practices are doing now to cope but it is a model that works well providing continuity and appointments, especially for our elderly.